Saturday, May 30, 2009

Political turmoil wracks northern state in Malaysia

Political turmoil wracks northern state in Malaysia
By Dante Pastrana 15 May 2009

In the latest twist in a protracted power struggle in the northern Malaysian state of Perak, a High Court judge ruled on May 11 that former Chief Minister Nizar Jamaluddin had been unconstitutionally removed from office and ordered his reinstatement. The following day, the appeals court issued a stay on the High Court decision pending a challenge by the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition and Nizar was again removed from office.

Nizar is a member of the Islamist Parti Islam se-Malaysia (PAS), which along with the People’s Justice Party (PKR) led by opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim and the ethnic-Chinese Democratic Action Party (DAP) form the People’s Alliance (PR). The main component of the BN coalition is the United Malay National Organisation (UMNO), which has held power at the national level since independence in 1957.

The political crisis in Perak stems from the major setbacks suffered by BN in Malaysia’s national elections in March 2008. BN lost its two-thirds majority in federal parliament and control of five of the country’s states to the PR coalition, including Perak. The losses forced Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi to announce later last year that he would step down as UMNO leader.

The turmoil in Perak erupted this January when UMNO assemblyman Nasarudin Hashim switched sides and joined Anwar’s PKR. The announcement shocked UMNO leaders who had been fending off attempts by Anwar to encourage others at the state and federal level to defect. It was also a blow to then Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak, who was chief of UMNO’s Perak chapter and due to take over as prime minister in March.

Within days, two PKR assemblymen—Jamaluddin Radzi and Osman Jailu—disappeared only to surface sometime later to declare themselves “independents” but “friendly” to the BN coalition. Deputy speaker Hee Yit Foong, a member of DAP, declared herself to be “independent” shortly after. She was followed by Nasarudin Hashim who switched back to UMNO, barely two weeks after declaring his allegiance to the PKR.

The four defections were enough to undermine PR’s majority in the state assembly. In response, Nizar formally asked the head of state, Sultan Shah, to dissolve the assembly and hold new elections, confident that the defectors would be defeated at the poll. The sultan, however, sided with BN, ruling that it could form a new state government.

These sordid political manoeuvres, in which prime minister-designate Najib had a major role, resulted in a march of 3,000 people to protest the sultan’s decision on February 6. Police broke up the march. Counter demonstrations by UMNO supporters stirred up ethnic Malay communalism and denounced plans by DAP chairperson Karpal Singh to challenge the sultan’s decision as unconstitutional.

A by-election in the federal Perak seat of Bukit Gantang in April quickly became a referendum on the ouster of the PR state government and the role of Najib. PAS fielded former Chief Minister Nizar as its candidate. UMNO responded by running a vicious communal campaign branding Nizar as a “Chinese stooge”. Ethnic Chinese comprise about 30 percent of Malaysia’s population.

UMNO attacked a state government measure passed last December allowing 149,000 people living in 483 planned and new villages to apply for freehold titles. Many of the villagers were ethnic Chinese who were relocated during the insurgency led by the Stalinist Malaysian Communist Party (MCP) in the 1950s. The land allocation, pushed by the DAP, was directly opposed by Najib who sought to maintain federal authority over land questions.

The results of the by-election, which Nizar won easily, came as a blow to Najib who had been installed as prime minister just two days earlier. Two other by-elections took place on the same day—BN won a state assembly seat in Sarawak but lost the state assembly seat of Bukit Selambau to the PKR in Kedah.

This week’s initial High Court decision was another blow to the prime minister. Judge Abdul Rajim, citing Article 16 Paragraph 6 of the Perak constitution, ruled that only the state assembly through a “vote of no confidence” had the power to dismiss a sitting state chief minister. As that had not taken place in February, Nizar remained “chief minister at all material times”.

The court system in Malaysia is notorious for its partisan decisions in favour of UMNO. As a result, the High Court ruling came as something of a surprise, indicating deep-seated divisions within the state apparatus over UMNO’s continued rule.

UMNO has maintained itself in power for more than half a century through a combination of Malay communal politics, police-state measures and economic policies that have benefitted a thin layer of the ethnic Malay elite. Sections of business, however, have come to regard UMNO’s policies as a barrier to foreign investment. Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim was expelled from UMNO and convicted on trumped-up charges in 1998 primarily because of his advocacy of the IMF’s free market agenda in the midst of the Asian financial crisis.

The deepening global recession that has hit the country’s export-oriented industries hard is exacerbating the divisions in Malaysian ruling circles. Differences over economic policies are being compounded by growing fears in the ruling elite of an eruption of social unrest due to rising unemployment and poverty. Neither coalition—the BN and the opposition PR—represent the interests of working people.

The Centre for Public Policy Studies in 2008 reported that Malaysia had the highest Gini Coefficient in Asia. The Gini Coefficient is a standard measure of social inequality—0 denotes total equality and 1 denotes total inequality. Malaysia’s coefficient stood at 0.46.

According to the 2008 Forbes wealth report, the 40 richest Malaysians had amassed a total of $46 billion, equivalent to more than 21 percent of the 2008 GDP. Among the richest was Najib’s younger brother, chief executive officer of Bumiputra Holdings Company, worth $100 million, and the son of former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammed with $285 million.

Official estimates of poverty are low. According to ALIRAN, a Malaysian human rights organisation, the official poverty line is well below the actual cost of living in Malaysia. ALIRAN estimated the real level of poverty at over 25 percent of the population in 2004.

The Malaysian economy is rapidly heading for recession. Exports fell for the fifth consecutive month in February, dropping 15.9 percent year-on-year after plunging 27.8 percent year-on-year in January. A UN think tank has predicted zero growth for the economy in 2009. The Malaysian Insider reported that 26,000 workers have been laid off since October 2008, with total job losses expected to reach 40,000 by May.

The government is attempting to make the country’s estimated 3.5 million foreign workers—legal and so-called illegal residents from Indonesia, the Philippines, India and Burma—the scapegoat for the worsening social crisis. The contracts for 300,000 foreign workers have not been renewed. The government has announced plans in parliament to reduce the number of foreign workers by more than 400,000 by 2010.

In office for just over a month, Prime Minister Najib has attempted to undermine Anwar and the opposition by promising a series of “reforms” to encourage foreign investment, including possible changes to discriminatory policies against the country’s Chinese and Indian minorities. Such measures, however, will inevitably create divisions within UMNO that has always relied heavily on Malay communalism. Moreover, UMNO’s loss of two out of three by-elections last month, indicate that the BN government remains broadly unpopular despite the change of prime minister.

Within this context, the ongoing political crisis in Perak, as an indication of broader trends, demonstrates that UMNO’s protracted hold on power is slipping.

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Notes of decision in Zambry v Nizar Case (CoA)

By Edmund Bon, The Malaysian Insider

MAY 23 — These are the notes taken of the Court of Appeal’s Decision in the MB v MB matter delivered orally on 22.5.2009 by Raus Sharif JCA on behalf of the His Lordship, Zainun Ali JCA and Ahmad Maarop JCA.
Any mistakes herein are mine.
Firstly, we would like to thank counsel in assisting us to arrive at our decision. The decision is unanimous and these are our views:
1. The granting or withholding of consent to dissolve the State Assembly is a royal prerogative to be exercised by His Royal Highness (HRH).
2. From the facts of this case, the request made by the Respondent (Nizar) to dissolve the State Assembly was made under Article 16(6) of the Perak Constitution, and not under Article 36(2).
3. Under Article 16(6) of the Perak Constitution, upon the exercise of HRH’s royal prerogative to withhold consent for dissolution, the Respondent shall tender his resignation.
4. There is no mandatory, express requirement that provides for a motion of no-confidence to be passed in the State Assembly against the Respondent before he ceases to command the confidence of the majority.
5. The fact that the Respondent has ceased to command the confidence of the majority may be ascertained through extraneous means. We approve the case of Amir Kahar. The case of Stephen Kalong Ningkan, adopted by the learned Judge (High Court), is distinguishable on its facts.
6. HRH was right to make enquiries to satisfy himself whether the Respondent had ceased to command the confidence of the majority before deciding on the Respondent’s request for dissolution.
7. On the facts of the case, it is clear that the Respondent had ceased to command the confidence of the majority thus HRH, in accordance with Article 16(6), was right to appoint the Appellant (Zambry) as Mentri Besar of Perak after being satisfied that the Appellant commanded the confidence of the majority.
8. The learned Judge (High Court) erred in law when interpreting the Perak Constitution. He failed to properly appreciate the evidence rendering his decision clearly wrong.
9. The appeal is allowed. The orders of the High Court are set aside.
… [Exchange between counsel for Nizar and Zambry with the Bench on the issue of costs.]
No order as to cost.
… [Exchange between counsel for Nizar and Zambry with the Bench on ancillary matters:
Haji Sulaiman: My Lords and My Lady, I have been instructed to appeal the decision. Due to the urgency of the matter, I pray that Your Lordships and Ladyship supply us with the grounds of judgment as soon as possible.
Raus Sharif JCA: I have tried to prepare the full grounds last night but could not do so. Will supply in a week's time. What about the application to set aside the stay?
Haji Sulaiman: We leave it to the Court to decide.
Raus Sharif JCA: Isn't it academic already?
Haji Sulaiman: We are of the view that the Court of Appeal was wrong to grant the stay. To say that we concede is not entirely correct but it has served no purpose anymore. We therefore leave it to Your Lordships and Ladyship to decide. Alternatively, for a Court to to fix a hearing date.
Cecil Abraham: We seek that the application be dismissed.
Raus Sharif JCA: Enclosure 9(a) is dismissed.
Haji Sulaiman: My Lord, it should be struck out as it has not been heard on the merits.
Raus Sharif JCA: Yes. Application struck out.] — loyarburok.com

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi, Datuk Abdul Aziz Rahim sewajarnya meletak jawatan setelah Mahkamah Rayuan mendapati beliau salah dalam membuat keputusan yang melibatkan parti kerajaan.

Sendainya Yang Arif tegas dengan keputusan yang telah beliau sendiri adili, sewajarnya beliau menyatakan protes dengan meletak jawatan beliau serta merta kerana keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan telah merendahkan kemampuan beliau untuk membuat penghakiman dan sudah tentu beliau tidak akan lagi mempunyai masa depan yang cerah untuk menjawat jawatan lebih tinggi selagi kerajaan songsang masih berkuasa.

Zambry kekal MB

Oleh Khirul Bahri Basaruddin dan Saufi Hamzah
bhnews@bharian.com.my

Tiga hakim Mahkamah Rayuan ketepi keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi

PUTRAJAYA: Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir kekal sebagai Menteri Besar Perak apabila Mahkamah Rayuan semalam membenarkan rayuannya bagi mengetepikan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi 11 Mei lalu yang mengisytiharkan Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin pemegang sah jawatan itu.


Dalam keputusan sebulat suara, tiga panel hakim Mahkamah Rayuan yang bersidang mendapati Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi, Datuk Abdul Aziz Rahim salah dalam membuat tafsiran peruntukan relevan terhadap Undang-undang Tubuh Negeri Perak (UTNP).


“Yang Arif Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi berkenaan gagal menilai dengan betul dan secukupnya semua keterangan yang ada padanya sehingga membuat keputusan


yang salah,” kata Hakim Datuk Md Raus Shariff, yang bersidang bersama Hakim Datuk Zainun Ali dan Hakim Datuk Ahmad Maarop.


Mohd Raus dalam keputusan lisannya juga memutuskan Sultan Perak, Sultan Azlan Shah membuat keputusan betul melantik Zambry sebagai Menteri Besar selepas mendapati Mohammad Nizar kehilangan sokongan majoriti Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (Adun) Perak pada Februari lalu.


“Kami juga berpendapat bahawa keputusan sama ada membenarkan atau tidak permohonan pembubaran Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) adalah dalam bidang kuasa Sultan,” katanya. Mohd Raus memberitahu peguam Mohammad Nizar, Sulaiman Abdullah pihaknya akan menulis alasan penghakiman dalam tempoh seminggu.


Sulaiman memberitahu mahkamah, anak guamnya akan memfailkan rayuan dalam tempoh 30 hari dan memohon mahkamah menyiapkan alasan penghakiman bertulis secepat mungkin bagi membolehkan rayuan mereka didengar Mahkamah Persekutuan.


Mahkamah itu juga membatalkan permohonan Mohammad Nizar untuk mengetepikan keputusan Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan, Datuk Ramly Ali, menangguhkan pelaksanaan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi selepas diberitahu pemohon ingin menarik balik permohonannya.


Mohd Raus berkata, mereka sependapat bahawa mengikut hak istimewa Sultan Perak, apabila permohonan Mohammad Nizar yang dibuat mengikut Perkara 16 (6) UTNP untuk pembubaran DUN ditolak, beliau mesti meletak jawatan.


“Tiada peruntukan khusus atau mandatori dalam UTNP untuk diadakan undi sokongan majoriti di DUN Perak. Malah, kehilangan sokongan majoriti Mohammad Nizar boleh ditentukan dengan cara lain (tidak hanya melalui undi).


“Sultan Perak betul untuk menjalankan siasatan dan adalah jelas bahawa Mohammad Nizar kehilangan sokongan majoriti di DUN Perak. Oleh itu, Sultan mempunyai hak untuk melantik Zambry sebagai Menteri Besar,” katanya.


Peguam Zambry, Datuk Cecil Abraham, berkata anak guamnya akan meneruskan tugas seperti biasa selepas rayuannya dibenarkan.


Pada 11 Mei lalu, Mahkamah Tinggi mengisytiharkan Mohammad Nizar sebagai Menteri Besar Perak yang sah selepas membenarkan permohonan semakan kehakimannya.


Bagaimanapun sehari kemudian, Mahkamah Rayuan membenarkan permohonan Zambry menangguhkan pelaksanaan keputusan itu sehingga rayuannya diputuskan. Mohammad Nizar kemudian mengemukakan permohonan bagi mengetepikan keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan itu.


Mohammad Nizar memfailkan semakan kehakiman itu pada 13 Februari lalu, memohon perintah injunksi bagi menghalang Zambry, yang dilantik Menteri Besar pada 6 Februari lalu, atau ejennya daripada menjalankan tugas sebagai Menteri Besar.